MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2895916880

Chiadzwa Resistance to Development Dispossession: Kleptocracy and Rural Struggles in Zimbabwe

2018· article· en· W2895916880 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Munyaradzi Hwami, Daniel Madzanire, Evelyn Hwami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismResistance (ecology)Political scienceNeoliberalism (international relations)NeocolonialismEthnologyHumanitiesColonialismSociologyPolitical economyArtLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article recognizes and analyzes rural resistance to the proliferation of the fateful experience of modernity and its related commercial industrial principles. Resistance by rural communities finds itself submerged by more spectacular urban and media attractive narratives. Utilizing a critical interpretive study of the dispossessed and displaced rural dwellers of Chiadzwa in Zimbabwe, we capture their experiences and expositions to assess resistance to development dispossession that even post-colonial humanitarianism has footnoted. The brutality of instruments of global capitalism in the form of the post/neo-colonial state is exposed, and the futile but brave resistance of the villagers given deserved space. The theoretical knowledge engagements emanating from the dauntless efforts of the people of Chiadzwa are discussed and located within other international struggles against the immiserating and failing global capitalism. The article valorizes resistance against the creation of a commercial society of self-seeking individuals engaged in endless competition as this is the essence of neoliberalism. Keywords: rural resistance, global capitalism, accumulation by dispossession, development displacement, neocolonialism, kleptocracy, Zimbabwe ------------------------------------------------------- La Résistance de Chiadzwa face au Développement de la Dépossession: Kleptocratie et Luttes Rurales au Zimbabwe Résumé Cet article identifie et analyse la résistance rurale à la prolifération de l'expérience fatidique de la modernité et de ses principes industriels et commerciaux connexes. La résistance des communautés rurales se trouve elle-même submergée par des témoignages très spectaculaires et médiatiques. En utilisant une étude interprétative critique de riverains ruraux du Chiadzwa, au Zimbabwe, qui ont été dépossédés et déplacés, nous capturons leurs expériences et expositions pour évaluer la résistance au développement face au développement de dépossessions que même les mouvements humanitaires postcoloniaux ont notées. La brutalité des instruments du capitalisme global dans la forme de l'état post/néocolonial est exposée et la résistance futile mais brave des villageois recoit la place qu elle merite. La connaissance théorique des engagements émanant d'audacieux efforts des gens de Chiadzwa sont discutés et situés à l'intérieur d'autres luttes internationales contre l'appauvrissement et les manquements du système capitalisme. L'article valorise la résistance contre la création d'une société commerciale d'individus égoïstes engagés dans une compétition continue, essence du néo-libéralisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community development→Same topicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues→French-language works237,207→