MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895921066 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky391

Body condition of late pregnant gilts affects the expression of selected adipokines and their receptors in mammary fat and backfat tissues1

2018· article· en· W2895921066 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiane Regina do Amaral Duarte, C. Farmer, Marie‐France Palin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsLeptinProlactinAdiponectinEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyMammary glandLactationAdipokineGestationAdipose tissueProlactin receptorLeptin receptorReceptorHormonePregnancyInsulinObesityMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of body condition in late gestating gilts on gene expression of selected adipokines and their receptors in backfat and mammary fat tissues was studied. The presence of associations between mammary gland composition variables and the mRNA abundance of selected genes and serum concentrations of adiponectin and leptin was also investigated. A total of 45 gilts were selected at mating based on their backfat depth and were allocated to three groups: (1) low backfat (LBF; 12-15 mm; n = 14), (2) medium backfat (MBF; 17-19 mm; n = 15), and (3) high backfat (HBF; 22-26 mm; n = 16). Gilts were fed different amounts of a conventional diet to maintain differences in backfat depth throughout the gestation period. Blood samples were collected at day 109 of gestation to measure adiponectin and leptin serum concentrations. Gilts were slaughtered on day 110 of gestation, and mammary glands were collected to determine mammary composition. Mammary fat and backfat tissues were also sampled to measure the mRNA abundance of selected genes. In mammary fat tissue, there was an effect of body condition on the prolactin (PRL; P = 0.01), adiponutrin (PNPLA3; P < 0.10), and prolactin receptor long form (PRLR-LF; P < 0.10) genes. There was a greater PRL mRNA abundance in mammary fat tissue from HBF than LBF or MBF gilts (P < 0.05). The PNPLA3 mRNA abundance was lower in HBF than in MBF gilts (P < 0.05), and that of PRLR-LF was lower in LBF than in HBF gilts (P < 0.05). In backfat, body condition affected the mRNA abundance of leptin (P < 0.05) and PNPLA3 (P < 0.01), with the greatest expression levels being observed in HBF gilts for both genes. Association analyses suggest a detrimental effect of high circulating leptin concentrations on gilts mammary development, as reflected by the negative correlations between serum leptin and protein percent (r = -0.66, P < 0.01), and concentrations of DNA (r = -0.62, P < 0.01) and RNA (r = -0.60, P < 0.01) in mammary parenchyma. Current results show that body condition of gilts at the end of gestation can affect the expression of adipokines in mammary fat and backfat tissues, with a different regulation of transcript abundance being observed in these two fat depots. Results also suggest that circulating leptin is strongly associated with mammary gland composition of late pregnant gilts, whereas locally synthesized leptin from mammary fat tissue is not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207