Abstract WP30: Role of Solitaire in Endovascular treatment for Acute Serious Stroke Due to Intracranial In Situ Thrombosis (ROSE ASSIST study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Solitaire, a representative stent retriever, shows high performance in removing embolic clots; however, its reperfusion potential in intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD)-related occlusions is rarely reported. In this ROSE ASSIST study, we hypothesized that Solitaire is as effective for removing in-situ thrombi in ICAD-related occlusions as much as its performance in cardiogenic or cryptogenic embolism. Methods: ASIAN KR, an observational multicenter registry (n=721) enrolling patients who underwent endovascular treatment for acute cervicocephalic artery occlusions, was retrospectively reviewed. Through blinded evaluations, ICAD-related (significant fixed focal stenosis observed at the occlusion site during endovascular treatment) and embolic (no or minimal stenosis observed) occlusions were classified. Among patients treated with Solitaire stent (n=373), exclusion criteria were as follows: onset to puncture time >720 min; occlusion etiology neither ICAD-related nor embolic; both ICAD-related occlusion and atrial fibrillation. Primary endpoint was successful reperfusion (modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia 2b-3) immediately after Solitaire stent retrieval. Comparative analyses were performed between embolic and ICAD-related occlusions (2:1 matched by propensity score; age, sex, onset to puncture time and primary endovascular method adjusted). Results: In total, 270 patients (embolic, 216; ICAD-related, 54) were included in the analyses. After propensity score matching, successful reperfusion rate following Solitaire stent treatment did not differ between etiologic groups (embolic, 77.8% vs. 68.5%, p=0.201). Although final successful reperfusion grade was similarly achieved between groups (83.3% vs. 75.9%, p=0.259), median number of endovascular methods was higher in ICAD-related occlusions (2 [interquartile range, 1-2] vs. 2 [2-3], p<0.001). The grade and frequency of intracerebral hemorrhagic transformation and subarachnoid hemorrhage did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The immediate reperfusion performance of Solitaire for ICAD-related occlusions was as substantial as for embolic occlusions although these occlusions more often needed other treatment methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".