MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895925635 · doi:10.1002/hyp.13303

Time‐domain electromagnetic imaging of a clayey confining bed in a brackish environment: A case study in the Kairouan Plain Aquifer (Kelbia salt lake, Tunisia)

2018· article· en· W2895925635 on OpenAlexaff
Cécile Finco, Coralie Pontoreau, Cyril Schamper, Sylvain Massuel, Gaghik Hovhannissian, Fayçal Réjiba

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement
KeywordsAquiferGeologyBrackish waterGroundwaterHydraulic conductivityHydrology (agriculture)AridWater wellSalinityGeomorphologySoil scienceGeotechnical engineeringSoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The semi‐arid Plio‐Quaternary aquifer of the Kairouan Plain is located in the central part of Tunisia. In this region, the main form of human activity is extensive agriculture. The few lithological logs in this area indicate that the aquifer is divided into two groundwater reservoirs separated by a confining clay layer. In the shallower groundwater reservoir, the electrical conductivity of the water is close to 1,200 mS/m, that is, 3 to 4 times higher than that of the deeper aquifer, which is currently used for irrigation. Recently, an increase in salinity has been observed, which is producing significant difficulties with irrigation. In order to determine the geometry of the confining clay layer and assess the potential connectivity between both reservoirs, time‐domain electromagnetic (TDEM) and vertical electrical soundings surveys were carried out. In the extremely conductive environment (electrical resistivities <10 Ωm) of the Sebkha Kelbia, the TDEM survey produced the first geophysical map of this near‐surface aquifer system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207