Effect of surface treatment on the physical and mechanical properties of injection molded poly(lactic acid)‐coir fiber biocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, two different surface treatments were evaluated to improve the compatibility of coir fibers with poly(lactic acid). The chemical modifications were achieved by fiber surface treatment with a maleic anhydride grafted to poly(lactic acid) (MAPLA) solution or a poly(methyl vinyl ether‐alt‐maleic anhydride) (MA‐c‐PMVE) aqueous solution. The fibers were analyzed by attenuated total reflectance‐Fourier transform infrared to determine the type and level of surface modification. The biocomposites were compounded via extrusion and molded by injection. Mechanical testing showed increases in tensile modulus (around 16%) and flexural modulus (around 16%) for both treatments, but MA‐c‐PMVE (29%) was more effective than MAPLA (15%) in strength improvement. Finally, the surface treated fibers led to much lower biocomposites water absorption than untreated ones. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:2132–2141, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".