Glass Sculpture at Dr. George Robert Grasett Park
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Grasett Park is a glass art sculpture commissioned by the Government of Ireland, to be built in the City of Toronto, to honor the sacrifices made by Dr. George Grasett and his Canadian colleagues to accommodate Irish famine refugees that arrived in Toronto in 1847. The sculpture introduces a series of glass panels positioned like a “house‐of‐cards”, with structural glass panels up to 7 m tall. They generally consist of pair(s) base panels that supports the upper panel(s), all stabilized by rod bracings connected with stainless steel point fixings. Due to the complex geometry and high level of concentrated load, the point fixings are custom designed to allow grout filling within oversized glass holes to minimize additional stress concentration introduced by uneven bearing. Since the localized effects and global effects of stress are not independent, the detailed point fixings are meticulously modelled within a global finite element model. The glass panel is designed based on CGSB 12.20‐M89 and adapts design principles for point fixings introduced in DIN 18008. Typical upper panels are found to be adequate at 3 layers of 10 mm thick fully‐tempered glass, while lower panels are 5 layers of 12 mm. The maximum stress is limited to approximately between 60–80 N/mm 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it