MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896042402 · doi:10.32370/2018_09_6

"The Specifics of Teenager’s Socialisation in Orphanage ""Perlynka"" "

2018· article· en· W2896042402 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Svitlana Petrova

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingPsychologyPersonalitySocializationSocial psychologyProcess (computing)Quality (philosophy)Developmental psychologyBig Five personality traitsPersonality developmentEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This articles gives a theoretical specifics of teenager's socialisation in "Perlynka".A theoretical analysis of philosophical, psychological, and pedagogical literature in this issue enables us to specify the notion "socialisation of an orphan".We think that socialisation of an orphan is the process of the formation and the development of a personality which aims at mastering the activity while being influenced by an environment.It involves learning ways of social lifestyle, a system of social links, ideas and values, behavioural standards.They develop their personal traits, form their activeness and develop their own lifestyle and obtain a social experience during the process of socialisation of a personality.The efficiency of socialisation depends on such conditions as the agreement between a social practice and the nature, aims, and sense of an educative influence on a child; the total impact of objective and subjective factors; the intensity of the education and self-education; the activeness of accompanying process such as learning and education; the intensity of the impact on "inner world" of orphans (the system of motives, needs, emotions, intelligence, will); the combination of pedagogical impact and the degree of the development of verbal and sensor processes of students; the intensity and the quality of relations (the communication between orphans).Identified two groups of factors which directly influence on the process of the formation of an orphan's personality.Referred to the first groups the following: a social orphanage, the specifics of the fosters (the lack of self confidence, inferiority complex, the feeling of social remoteness, the lack of skills of the communication which goes beyond conventional situation, the immaturity of inner position, the loss of the interest to learning, the inclination to mental disorder, the orientation to adaptation, etc.; difficulties of socialisation (the lack of individual and social experience which is obtained while being raised in a biological family, mistakes of the upbringing and the full absence of social experience; difficulties which are linked to understanding and doing social roles which leads to the refusal from the role, misunderstanding of its social value).These factors complicate the process of the formation of a teenager's personality at an orphanage.The second group of factors includes: the sensitivity of a teenager to the process of the personality's formation; the peculiarities of organisational and pedagogical functioning of orphan asylum "Perlynka". Key words:the formation of a personality, the specifics of the process of the formation of a personality, social orphanage, teenagers, orphan asylum "Perlynka". Актуальність дослідження.Реформування системи освіти на засадах особистісно орієнтованого підходу актуалізує необхідність посилення уваги науковців до формування дитини як активного суб'єкта життєдіяльності, здатного до елементарних форм відповідального самовизначення, самореалізації.У цьому контексті актуальності

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicEducational Methods and Teacher DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207