Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis summarizes the experimental and analytical results of studies on the behavior of two FRP-encased steel-concrete composite columns under axial loading. Composite columns have been conventionally constructed using steel and concrete. This study utilizes FRP in combination with steel and concrete to manufacture composite columns with enhanced behavior. The first type of column is a concrete-encased steel column wrapped with epoxy-saturated glass and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP and CFRP) sheets in the transverse direction. The second type of composite column utilizes a GFRP tube that surrounds a steel I section column, which is subsequently filled with concrete. To the best of the author's knowledge, columns comprising FRP, steel and concrete in the shape of the proposed composite systems has not been reported on in the literature. This study includes two major phases. In the first phase, behavior of stub columns is investigated where stability effects are ignored and failure is governed by the loss of cross-sectional strength. In the second phase, influence of stability on the behavior of the proposed composite columns is studied by testing specimens with various slenderness ratios. To investigate the cross-sectional strength, a total of nine short (500 mm in height) composite column specimens were constructed and tested under axial compression. Five specimens were wrapped with FRP sheets and the remaining four were constructed using a GFRP tube. Experimental results showed significant enhancement in the behavior of the composite columns which was achieved due to confinement and composite action between the constituent materials. The compressive strength of the confined concrete core in the composite specimens constructed using FRP sheets and GFRP tube increased by a factor of 2.4 and 1.8, respectively. An analytical model was developed to predict crosssectional behavior of the proposed composited column. With the primary objective of investigating the influence of slenderness on the behavior of the composite columns, ten additional column specimens, ranging between 1,000 mm and 3,000 mm in height, were tested. Five specimens were constructed using FRP sheets and five constructed using the GFRP tube technique. It was found that the compressive strength of the confined concrete core in the longest tubular composite specimen was reduced to approximately 60% of that of the corresponding short specimen. No confinement was achieved in the longest FRP wrapped composite column specimen. Three bare steel columns, ranging between 500 mm and 3,000 mm in height, were also tested to facilitate comparison with the composite columns in terms of increased axial capacity, as well as stiffness and energy dissipation characteristics of the columns. The compressive strength, elastic axial stiffness and ultimate axial strain of the bare steel columns increased by a factor of up to 10, 6 and 3, respectively, in the composite columns constructed utilizing the concrete-filled GFRP tube. These factors were reduced to 5 .2, 2.5 and 2.6, respectively, in the concrete-encased steel columns wrapped with FRP jackets. Finally, an analytical model was developed to establish the capacity curves for the proposed composite columns accounting for slenderness effects. A simple design equation to predict the compressive strength of the tubular composite columns was proposed based on the capacity curve generated from the analytical model. Compressive capacity of the composite columns predicted using the proposed design equation showed favorable agreement with the experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".