MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2896232608 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy359

Three cases of venous thromboembolism in advanced cancer patients

2018· article· en· W2896232608 on OpenAlexaff
Keigo Komine, Masanobu Takahashi, Sakura Hiraide, Sho Umegaki, Yoshifumi Kawamura, Hideharu Yamada, Akira Okita, Sonoko Chikamatsu, Yuki Kasahara, Yoshinari Okada, Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Masahiro Takahashi, Hidekazu Shirota, Chikashi Ishioka

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFOLFIRIPulmonary embolismThrombusBevacizumabChemotherapyAsymptomaticColorectal cancerSurgeryCancerRadiologyInternal medicineIrinotecan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is high and the symptoms of VTE observed in daily practice are varied. Here we report three cases of VTE treated at Department of Medical Oncology in Tohoku University. Case 1: A 42-year-old man diagnosed with urachal carcinoma had received FOLFIRI for 10 months. He felt his shortness of breath became strong for several weeks. Computed tomography (CT) revealed pulmonary embolism, thus he was hospitalized urgently. Heparin was administered for 1 week, and then direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) was started. His shortness of breath was improved and CT showed the reduction of embolism, therefore he discharged 13 days after treatment started. CT after 3 months was confirmed the loss of thrombus and recurrence was not observed. Clinically relevant bleeding was not observed, therefore chemotherapy could be continued smoothly. Case 2: A 61-year-old man diagnosed with rectal cancer had received bevacizumab + FOLFIRI for 2 months. An asymptomatic thrombus around the catheter of central venous access port was accidently pointed out by CT to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy. DOAC was administered, and then CT examination after 1 months was confirmed the loss of thrombus. Recurrence was not observed and clinically relevant bleeding was not observed. Case 3: A 51-year-old man diagnosed with rectal cancer had received cetuximab + FOLFIRI for 2 months. His performance status was poor due to tumor progression and adverse events of chemotherapy. Pulmonary embolism was detected by CT to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy, thus he was hospitalized urgently and heparin and warfarin were administered. His prothrombin time-international normalized ratio did not remain within the target range, therefore DOAC was administered. However, the bleeding of his stoma was observed after 10 days, DOAC was discontinued. Anticoagulant therapy was never performed after that because of his poor systemic condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Oncology→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→