Hypophagic effects of insulin are mediated via NPY<sub>1</sub>/NPY<sub>2</sub> receptors in broiler cockerels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) plays a mediatory role in cerebral insulin function by maintaining energy balance. The current study was designed to determine the role of insulin in food intake and its interaction with NPY receptors in 8 experiments using broiler cockerels (4 treatment groups per experiment, except for experiment 8). Chicks received control solution or 2.5, 5, or 10 ng of insulin in experiment 1 and control solution or 1.25, 2.5, or 5 μg of receptor antagonists B5063, SF22, or SML0891 in experiments 2, 3, and 4 through intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection, respectively. In experiments 5, 6, and 7, chicks received ICV injection of B5063, SF22, SML0891, or co-injection of an antagonist + insulin, control solution, and insulin. In experiment 8, blood glucose was measured. Insulin, B5063, and SML0891 decreased food intake, while SF22 led to an increase in food intake. The hypophagic effect of insulin was also reinforced by injection of B560, but ICV injection of SF22 destroyed this hypophagic effect of insulin and increased food intake (p < 0.05). However, SML0891 had no effect on decreased food intake induced by insulin (p > 0.05). At 30 min postinjection, blood sugar in the control group was higher than that in the insulin group (p < 0.05). Therefore, the NPY1 and NPY2 receptors mediate the hypophagic effect of insulin in broiler cockerels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".