MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896520629 · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aafd1b

Bootstrapping the long-range Ising model in three dimensions

2019· article· en· W2896520629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIsing modelConformal mapUnitarityPhysicsScaling dimensionMultipletScalar (mathematics)Operator (biology)Conformal symmetryDimension (graph theory)Spin (aerodynamics)ScalingMathematical physicsMathematicsCombinatoricsStatistical physicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsSpectral lineGeometryQuantum field theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 3D Ising model and the generalized free scalar of dimension at least 0.75 belong to a continuous line of nonlocal fixed points, each referred to as a long-range Ising model. They can be distinguished by the dimension of the lightest spin-2 operator, which interpolates between 3 and 3.5 if we focus on the non-trivial part of the fixed line. A property common to all such theories is the presence of three relevant conformal primaries, two of which form a shadow pair. This pair is analogous to a superconformal multiplet in that it enforces relations between certain conformal blocks. By demanding that crossing symmetry and unitarity hold for a set of correlators involving the relevant operators, we compute numerical bounds on their scaling dimensions and OPE coefficients. Specifically, we raise the minimal spin-2 operator dimension to find successively smaller regions which eventually form a kink. Whenever a kink appears, its co-ordinates show good agreement with the epsilon expansion predictions for the critical exponents in the corresponding statistical model. As a byproduct, our results reveal an infinite tower of protected operators with odd spin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it