MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2896528066 · doi:10.1121/1.5067859

Towards the topology of autoencoder of calls versus clicks of marine mammal

2018· article· en· W2896528066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vincent Roger, Maxence Ferrari, Ricard Marxer, Faïcel Chamroukhi, Hervé Glotin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsAutoencoderComputer scienceWhaleArtificial neural networkSpeech recognitionBioacousticsBottlenose dolphinNetwork topologyRepresentation (politics)Inversion (geology)Artificial intelligenceAcousticsTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsMathematicsGeologyPhysicsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal is to learn the features and the representation adapted for cetacean sound dynamics without any priors. Thus, we develop data driven model to generate voicing and click of cetaceans audio signals. We learn representation and features of stationary or nonstationary emission using neural network from raw audio. We use different types of convolutions (causal, with strides, with dilation [1]), or gradient inversion [2]. Experiments are conducted on various kind of calls of humpback whales from nips4b challenge [3] or Orca whale. We compare the topology for transient encoding on Physeters and Inia g. For each model, we detail the resulting filters and discuss on the topology. We acknowledge Region PACA and NortekMED for Roger’s Phd grant, & DGA and Région Haut de France for Ferrari’s Phd grant. [1] Oord, Dieleman, Zen, Simonyan, Vinyals, Graves et al. Wavenet : A generative model for raw audio, arXiv:1609.03499, 2016 [2] Balestriero, Roger, Glotin, Baraniuk, Semi-Supervised Learning via New Deep Network Inversion, arXiv:1711.04313, 2017 [3] Glotin, LeCun, Mallat et al. Proc. 1st wkp on Neural Information Processing for Bioacoustics NIPS4B, joint to NIPS Alberta USA, 2013 http://sabiod.org/nips4b/challenge2.html, http://sabiod.org/NIPS4B2013_book.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→