MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2896532545 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.tp426

Abstract TP426: Major Cognitive Improvement in Patients With High Grade Intracranial Stenosis (70-99%) Within 3 Months of Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke

2018· article· en· W2896532545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Fareed K. Suri, Omar Saeed, Adnan I. Qureshi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentStroke (engine)Internal medicineEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceConfidence intervalStenosisPost-hoc analysisRandomized controlled trialCognitionCardiologyCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Cognitive impairment appears to be common manifestation in patients with high grade intracranial stenosis. The rates of improvement in cognitive impairment and associated factors are not well known. Objective: Identify the rates and predictors of major cognitive improvement in patients with non-disabling stroke or TIA attributed to 70%-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery. Methods: A post hoc analysis of patients in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial was performed. Each patient underwent cognitive assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) prior to (within 30 day of TIA or non-disabling stroke) and at 3 months post randomization. Major cognitive improvement was defined by an increase in Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 2 points or greater at follow up evaluation. Results: A total of 172 (38.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 32.8 - 44.2) of 451 patients randomized had major improvement in cognitive assessment. The rate of major cognitive improvement was 151 (33.5% 95% CI 28.5 - 39.2) and 21 (4.7% 95% CI 3.0 - 7.0) among patients with MoCA score of <26 and ≥26 at baseline evaluation. The rates of major cognitive improvement did not differ between patients who were randomized to stent placement compared with best medical treatment (85 [49.4%] versus 87 [50.6%], relative risk [RR] 1.1, p=0.4). The rates of major cognitive improvement were significantly higher among patients aged ≥65 years (72 [41.9%] versus 55 [31.1%], relative risk [RR] 0.8, p=.03) and those with systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg at follow up visit (53 [30.8%] versus 39 (22.0%), relative risk [RR] 0.9, p=.05). There was a trend towards lower rates of major cognitive improvement in patients with HbA1C >6 at baseline assessment. No relationship between LDL cholesterol ≥70 mg/dl at baseline or follow up visit and major cognitive improvement was identified. Conclusions: A relatively high rate of major cognitive improvement was observed in patients with high grade symptomatic intracranial stenosis within 3 months. The paradoxical relationship between greater age and higher systolic blood pressure at follow up evaluation with major cognitive improvement require further studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→