MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896546127 · doi:10.5772/intechopen.78065

Generator Insulation-Aging On-Line Monitoring Technique Based on Fiber Optic Detecting Technology

2018· book-chapter· en· W2896546127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Küng

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical engineeringOptical fiberEngineeringElectromagnetic interferenceSCADAFiber optic sensorStatorGenerator (circuit theory)Electronic engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between insulation aging and generator lifespan using fiber optic sensors (FOSs) is explored to ultimately improve asset lifespan through smart choices in running conditions and maintenance. Insulation aging is a major factor that causes generator failure. FOS provides the rare opportunity of being installed up close to the insulation, monitoring degradations that are otherwise difficult to detect. FOSs, unlike purely electrical transducers, are immune to high voltage (HV) and strong electromagnetic (EM) fields. They are small and have a proven long life by their deployment in the Telecom industry. The proposed FOS is a Fabry-Perot cavity made up of two identical fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) using light wave interference as the working principle. Such architecture delivers simultaneous vibration (10 Hz–1 kHz) and temperature (0.1°C resolution) monitoring, both helping to spot irregular vibration patterns (signatures) and hot-spots inside the generator stator slots. The signal processing unit equipped with a gateway device can help to connect the large volume of sensor data, allowing correlation with the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system data of the plant. This chapter also elaborates on the field test jointly conducted with Calpine Corporation and Oz Optics, Ltd. (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207