MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2896569551 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.wmp69

Abstract WMP69: Imaging Analysis to Assess Stroke Mechanism in Aortic Dissection

2018· article· en· W2896569551 on OpenAlexaff
Ericka Teleg, Bijoy K. Menon, Jehanggir Appoo, Akash Fichdaya, Fady Mina, Alex Gregory

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Aortic dissectionCollateral circulationDissection (medical)Aortic archSurgeryCardiologyPerfusion scanningPerfusionRadiologyInternal medicineAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Stroke is a frequent complication in patients having surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) where a variety of neurocirculatory techniques are used to reconstruct the arch. In order for surgeons to prevent stroke, first an understanding of the dynamic hemodynamic processes that cause stroke is required. Objective of this study is to determine radiological characteristics and mechanisms of stroke in ATAAD. So far, surgical literature has only reported on incidence. Methods: From 2006-2016, of 189 ATAAD patients at a single centre, 42 had a stroke. Charts and brain imaging were reviewed by 2 Neurologists. Great vessel pathology along with willisian collateral status was identified. Stroke territory (anterior or posterior circulation), distribution (unilateral or bilateral) and number of lesions were identified. Mechanism of stroke was classified as hypoperfusion (water-shed, borderzone pattern), embolic (cortical multiple or wedge shaped) or combined. Results: All strokes were ischemic. Mean patient age 60.1 +/- 13.1 years. Stroke was diagnosed a median 3.0 days (IQR = 5.1) post operatively. NIHSS classification was mild in 7%, moderate in 81% and 12% had severe. Most strokes were multiple (65%) and in the anterior circulation (88% vs. 32 % posterior). Most patients had an embolic pattern of stroke (45% vs. 36% hypoperfusion vs 17% mixed). Detailed clinical and radiologic data are shown in Table 1. Conclusion: Stroke after ATAAD is ischemic, predominantly embolic, involves both hemispheres and results in significant morbidity. It remains unclear if stroke is a result of the dissection disease process extending to the brain vs. iatrogenically caused by choice and methodology of intraoperative surgical neurocirculatory management strategies used to reconstruct the aorta. Further studies will look for associations between pre-operative cerebrovascular abnormalities, intra-operative management, and mechanisms of stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→