MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896640865 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23366

Control loop performance monitoring based on weighted permutation entropy and control charts

2018· article· en· W2896640865 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ping Wu, Lingling Guo, Yiyong Duan, Wei Zhou, Guojun He

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEWMA chartControl chartEntropy (arrow of time)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsAlgorithmSeries (stratigraphy)StatisticsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The simple calculated permutation entropy is an intuitive index to measure the complexity of a time series by a comparison of neighbouring values, therefore, it can be used to detect dynamical changes in a time series. However, in permutation entropy, the amplitude information of a time series is ignored. By incorporating the variance information, weighted permutation entropy (WPE) can derive stable results, and enable the detection of abrupt changes in a time series. In this paper, weighted permutation entropy is employed to build the performance index from the closed loop output time series to monitor the control loop performance. Furthermore, two control charts are established to define the control limits for sample estimations of the WPE‐based performance index. In this study, the Shewhart control chart and the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart are integrated to develop two control performance monitoring schemes, Shewhart‐WPE and EWMA‐WPE. In addition, a numerical simulation is used to illustrate the ability and effectiveness of the developed Shewhart‐WPE scheme. The proposed EWMA‐WPE scheme is applied to monitor a natural gas pipeline transportation pressure control loop. The effectiveness of the proposed Shewhart‐WPE and EWMA‐WPE schemes is verified by the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207