MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896884434

Promoting Land-Based Food Practices in the not so Rural Idyll of Northern Lebanon: Dietary Solutions from Urban Perspectives

2018· article· en· W2896884434 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael A. Robidoux, Carla Haibi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocale (computer software)IdyllEthnologyEthnographyHumanitiesGeographyFood processingSociologyPolitical scienceArchaeologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is the result of two months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in rural Lebanon, studying local food harvesting, preparation and consumption practices. The study revealed the complexities of maintaining land-based lifestyles in contemporary Lebanon. It also exposed the paradoxical constructions of rural existence. In this paper, we deconstruct the mythical constructions of the rural idyll in the Lebanese village of Arsal and describe the multiple facets of local food production. If proponents of local food production are advocating for the preservation of local practices, it is critical to understand what is taking place in the communities and the environmental and economic factors they face engaging in the new global economy. Keywords: rural, rural idyll, Lebanon, land-based food practices, agriculture, health ------------------------------------------------------ Promouvoir les Pratiques Alimentaires basees sur les Ressources Naturelles dans une non-idylle rurale du Nord du Liban: Solutions Dietetiques selon des perspectives urbaines Resume Cet article est le resultat de deux mois de travail ethnographique de terrain conduit en milieu rural du Liban, pour etudier la recolte de nourriture locale, les habitudes de preparation et de consommation. L'etude a revele la complexite de maintenir un mode de vie base sur les ressources naturelles, dans un Liban contemporain. Elle a expose les structures paradoxales de l'existence rurale. Dans cet article, nous deconstruisons les structures mythiques de l'idylle rurale dans le village libanais d'Arsal et nous decrivons les multiples facettes de la production de nourriture locale. Si les partisans de la production de nourriture locale soutiennent la conservation des pratiques locales, il est critique de comprendre ce qui se passe dans les communautes ainsi que les facteurs environnementaux et economiques auxquels ils font face en s'engageant dans la nouvelle economie globale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207