An Innovative STEM Education Framework for a Changing Educational Landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes features of NAUTeach, a secondary mathematics teacher preparation program that is modeled onthe UTeach program at the University of Texas-Austin. NAUTeach is a research-based STEM program that developsthe next generation of mathematics and science teachers by engaging them in rigorous content and methodologycoursework specifically developed to provide a broad, cross-curricular framework of innovativeinstruction. NAUTeach has been specifically designed to serve the needs of preservice mathematics and scienceteachers as they embark on teaching a new generation of students in an ever changing world. The NAUTeachprogram focuses on the development of inquiry-based instructional methods, reflective practice, and peercollaboration through a carefully sequenced series of courses that consistently promote early and frequent field workand a learner-centered focus of teaching and learning. Though the NAUTeach program is a blended mathematics andscience teacher preparation program, this article will focus on the preparation of secondary mathematics teachers bydescribing the cross-curricular (mathematics & science) methodological sequence of courses, along with themathematics-specific pedagogical courses, that preservice mathematics teacher candidates take as part of this program.Connections between the NAUTeach program and guidelines for the content and pedagogical preparation of teacherswill be made with specific attention paid to the development of reflective, innovative, flexible, and reform-orientedmathematics teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".