MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897083953 · doi:10.3382/ps/pey446

Interactive effects of calcium and top-dressed 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 on egg production, egg shell quality, and bones attributes in aged Lohmann LSL-lite layers

2018· article· en· W2897083953 on OpenAlexaff
R. Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki, T Heuthorst, Alisha Mills, M. Neijat, Elijah G. Kiarie

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEggshellCalciumVitaminAnimal scienceVitamin D and neurologyChemistryBreaking strengthInternal medicineCholecalciferolEndocrinologyBiologyBiochemistryMedicineMaterials scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcium and vitamin D are critical in attenuating metabolic Ca insufficiency often observed in older hens. We investigated interactive effects of dietary Ca and top-dressed 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25OHD3) on egg production, eggshell quality (thickness, EST, and breaking strength, ESBS), serum Ca, kidney, liver, and bones attributes in 74-wk old Lohmann LSL-lite layers. A total of 4 levels of Ca (3.0, 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5%) and 3 levels of 25OHD3 (0, 69, and 138 μg/kg) were tested. All diets had basal level of 3,300 IU of vitamin D3/kg, were allocated to 84 individually housed hens (n = 7), and fed to 81 wk of age. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) in left ulna, femur, and tibia at week 74 (13 spare birds, baseline) and week 81. Birds fed diets containing 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5% Ca consumed 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, and 4.8 Ca g/b/d. Interaction (P < 0.05) between Ca and 25OHD3 was such that 25OHD3 linearly increased egg weight and percentage of eggs graded as jumbo (≥70 g) at 3.0, 3.5, and 4.5% Ca levels. There was no interaction (P > 0.05) between Ca and 25OHD3 on the rest of the parameters. Calcium increased EST and ESBS quadratically (P < 0.05), EST increased with Ca intake up to 4.1 g of Ca/b/d whereas Ca intakes (3.4 and 4.8 g of Ca/b/d) had poor ESBS relative to intermediate Ca intakes. Kidney ash concentration increased linearly (P = 009) with Ca intake. However, BMC and BMD in ulna, tibia, and femur declined (P < 0.05) at week 81 relative to baseline. In conclusion, top dressed 25OHD3 linearly increased egg weight at various Ca intakes with no negative effect on eggshell quality or bone attributes. Feeding 4.1 to 4.2 g of Ca/b/d improved eggshell quality, however, higher intake deteriorated eggshell quality and increased renal ash accumulation with no benefit on skeletal integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207