MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897110609 · doi:10.2351/1.5060761

Laser consolidation of net-shape shells for flextensional sonar projectors

2006· article· en· W2897110609 on OpenAlexaff
Lijue Xue, C. J. Purcell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser and Thermal Forming Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjectorConsolidation (business)Materials scienceFinite element methodShell (structure)3D printingUnderwaterSonarLaserAcousticsMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceOpticsStructural engineeringComposite materialGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser consolidation (LC) is a computer-aided manufacturing process that builds a functional net-shape part directly from a CAD model, without the use of moulds or dies. The folded shell projector (FSP) is a compact flextensional underwater sound projector developed by DRDC-Atlantic for low frequency sonar applications. The radiating surface of the FSP is a thin-walled shell of complex shape that challenges conventional manufacturing technologies. In this study, several versions of the FSP were designed using DRDC-Atlantic’s MAVART finite element code. NRC-IMTI refined the laser consolidation process and successfully manufactured the complex shells from IN-625 and Ti-6Al-4V alloys. The laser consolidated net-shape shells are metallurgically sound and exhibit excellent surface finish, dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties. Field tests of FSP prototypes demonstrated that the shells met their design goals of resonant frequency and source level. Other manufacturing methods for building the shells (electroforming, hydro-forming and Ni vapor deposition) were also explored. However, at the moment, the laser consolidation process is the only manufacturing technology capable of making the FSP shell to the required tolerances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser and Thermal Forming TechniquesFrench-language works237,207