Expanding the morphological spectrum of ovarian microcystic stromal tumour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To expand the morphological spectrum of ovarian microcystic stromal tumour, a rare neoplasm considered to have a relatively constant morphology with microcysts, solid cellular regions and hyalinised fibrous stroma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report four ovarian neoplasms in patients aged 45, 56, 61 and 71 years with the characteristic immunophenotype of microcystic stromal tumour (diffuse nuclear positivity with beta-catenin, cyclin D1 and WT1; diffuse cytoplasmic positivity with CD10; negative inhibin, calretinin, oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor). The tumours had variant morphology (diffuse, nested and corded arrangements in three cases, including one with spindle cell elements; nested, corded and tubular in the other). A CTNNB1 point mutation in exon 3 (c.98C>G,p.S33C; c.100G>A,p.G34R; c.97T>G,p.S33A) was present in the three cases with material available for testing. CONCLUSIONS: We feel that the cases we report are related to microcystic stromal tumour but with variant morphology; as such, the morphological spectrum of ovarian microcystic stromal tumour is broader than hitherto reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".