MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897263830 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.tp417

Abstract TP417: Cortical Microinfarcts on 3T MRI in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Associations With MRI Burden and Cognitive Dysfunction

2018· article· en· W2897263830 on OpenAlexaff
Hilde van den Brink, Angela Zwiers, Anna Charlton, Aaron Switzer, Cheryl R. McCreary, Brad Goodyear, Richard Frayne, Geert Jan Biessels, Eric E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral amyloid angiopathyMedicineHyperintensityPittsburgh compound BMagnetic resonance imagingCerebral blood flowInternal medicineDementiaAngiopathyCognitive declineMemory clinicPathologyCardiologyRadiologyDiabetes mellitusDiseaseEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) causes vascular cognitive impairment, possibly due to ischemic lesions that are caused by impaired cerebral blood flow. Cerebral microinfarcts (CMIs) are small ischemic lesions that are found in CAA patients at autopsy. Hypothesis: Cortical CMIs can be detected on in vivo 3T MR images in CAA and will correlate with markers of CAA-related vascular brain injury and cognitive function. Methods: We analysed data from CAA cases and neurologically healthy controls participating in the Functional Assessment of Vascular Reactivity (FAVR) study. All participants underwent a standardized clinical, neuropsychological and 3T MR assessment. Cortical CMIs were rated according to standardized criteria, by a single rater blinded to clinical information. Results: There were 36 CAA patients (mean age 73.0±9.0 years) and 22 healthy controls (69.0±8.3 years). Cortical CMIs were found in significantly more patients with CAA (50%) (median number: 1, range: 1-9) than in healthy controls (18%) ( p =0.02). In CAA, patients with cortical CMIs had higher white matter hyperintensity volumes (median 29.5 mL vs 13.0 mL, p =0.04) and cerebral microbleed counts (median 28 vs 5.5, p =0.049). CAA patients with cortical CMIs also showed lower occipital fMRI activation (median BOLD change 1.97% vs 2.57%, r =0.24, p =0.15) and worse memory performance (mean z -score -0.60 vs -0.05, p =0.12), although both effects were non-significant. No significant association of cortical CMIs with age, sex or vascular risk factors was found. Conclusions: Cortical CMIs are frequently detected on 3T MRI in CAA. They relate to well-established ischemic and hemorrhagic MRI markers of CAA. Therefore in vivo cortical CMIs can be regarded as a new marker of CAA disease severity. Additional, larger studies are needed to determine the relationship between CMI and clinical outcomes in CAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207