Bibliographic record
Abstract
Literature indicates that working with young children and their families should be nowadays a central dimension in the curricula of the ECEC services (European Commission, 2014, 0CDE 2015) and requires core competences that should be developed in the initial training and sustained in a 'competent system’ (Urban, al 2011). The analysis of some experiences in several countries underlines the importance of a broad, multilevel and contextualised perspective (Vandenbroeck, 2016) which engages professionals, their leaders, their teams and other stakeholders in learning professional communities (Sharmahd, 2017). All these results show the importance of relational, interpersonal and reflective competences beyond technical skills. Three action research projects on initial training and professional development have been carried out in Wallonia Brussels Federation (WBF) since 2011. In these, 150 practitioners, trainers, teachers, political heads and researchers from France, Flanders, England, Sweden and Quebec were gathered. Four steps were set: analysis of the main programmes of initial training in WBF, discovery of the educational programmes of several countries known for their quality workforce, proposal of recommendations. The results underline six principles and three competences to reform initial training and continuing professional development. They recognise the practitioners in the field of ECEC as educational professionals of relationships and reflexivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".