MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2897417792 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aae79d

Stray light in cone beam optical computed tomography: III. Evaluation of a redesigned large-volume commercial scanner based on a convergent light source

2018· article· en· W2897417792 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kurtis H Dekker, Rubin Hazarika, Kevin Jordan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreKingston General HospitalWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOpticsScannerImaging phantomCone beam computed tomographyStray lightBeam (structure)AttenuationAperture (computer memory)Light scatteringPhysicsOptical tomographyMaterials scienceScatteringTomographyComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Optical cone beam computed tomography (CT), using a digital camera to acquire 2D projection images, provides a fast, mechanically simple method for 3D radiation dosimetry. However, original cone beam designs had poor accuracy as a result of considerable scatter/stray light reaching the camera. Previously, our group presented a redesigned convergent light source for optical cone beam CT that considerably reduced stray light contribution and improved accuracy (Dekker et al 2016 Phys. Med. Biol . 61 2910). Here, we performed an evaluation of a newly updated commercial optical cone beam CT scanner (Vista TM , ModusQA, London, Canada) based on that design. Two different light source configurations were examined: the manufacturer’s default configuration which uses a 10 cm wide, 5 cm high diffuser light source, and a smaller, 1.5 cm diameter diffuser light source that more closely aligns with our previously described design. We imaged large volume (15 cm diameter cylinders) absorbing and scattering solution phantoms as well as a 1.25 cm diameter absorber placed within 15 cm diameter gel-like scattering phantom. Optical CT reconstructions were compared against narrow-beam measurements of attenuation made by placing an aperture in the optical CT system. Our results show that considerable stray light is present when using the manufacturer’s default configuration, as cupping artifacts and large (⩾10%) discrepancies between optical CT and narrow-beam attenuation measurements occur when imaging scattering phantoms. However, when imaging is performed using the 1.5 cm diameter source, optical CT measurements agree with narrow-beam measurements within ∼3% for both absorbing and scattering objects, as well as the small absorber in a scattering medium. Using this light source will require higher optical quality vessels than are currently provided by the manufacturer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and Biology→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→