MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897565628 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.2372

O1‐08‐01: THE NIH‐EXAMINER IS SENSITIVE TO COGNITIVE CHANGES IN ASYMPTOMATIC AND MILDLY SYMPTOMATIC FAMILIAL FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA

2018· article· en· W2897565628 on OpenAlexaff
Adam M. Staffaroni, Lynn Bajorek, Peter A. Ljubenkov, Kaitlin B. Casaletto, Fanny M. Elahi, Katya Rascovsky, Bradley F. Boeve, Adam L. Boxer, Jessica Bove, Danielle Brushaber, Giovanni Coppola, Christina Dheel, Brad C. Dickerson, Julie A. Fields, Jamie Fong, Leah K. Forsberg, Ralitza H. Gavrilova, Debra Gearhart, Nupur Ghoshal, Jill Goldman, Jonathan Graff Radford, Neill R. Graff‐Radford, Murray Grossman, Dana Haley, Hilary W. Heuer, John Hsiao, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Edward D. Huey, David J. Irwin, David T. Jones, Lynne C. Jones, Kejal Kantarci, Anna M. Karydas, David S. Knopman, John Kornak, Walter K. Kremers, Walter A. Kukull, Maria I. Lapid, Diane Lucente, Ian R. Mackenzie, Masood Manoochehri, Bruce L. Miller, Madeline Potter, Rosa Rademakers, Katherine Rankin, Margaret Sutherland, Jeremy A. Syrjanen, Joanne Taylor, Sandra Weıntraub, Bonnie Wong, Zbigniew K. Wszołek, Howard J. Rosen, Joel H. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical Dementia RatingFrontotemporal dementiaDementiaCognitionPsychologyVerbal fluency testRating scaleAsymptomaticAudiologyC9orf72MedicineClinical psychologyOncologyInternal medicineNeuropsychologyPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At least 20% of cases of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are caused by dominantly inherited mutations. As pharmaceutical agents are developed to treat familial FTD, mutation carriers in the presymptomatic and mildly symptomatic stages offer a unique opportunity for dementia prevention. There is a need for validated clinical endpoints that are sensitive to change in these early stages. The NIH-EXAMINER is a battery of executive function tests that is sensitive to early changes in sporadic FTD. We investigated whether the NIH-EXAMINER battery could detect longitudinal changes in cognition in mutation carriers before conversion to dementia. 52 mutation carriers (C9orf72, MAPT and GRN) with at least two acquisitions of EXAMINER data and a global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) score < 1 (mean age=50.15; SD=12.82), were compared to 36 non-mutation carrier family members (mean age=49.37; SD=13.7). The NIH-EXAMINER yields an executive function (EF) composite, which includes measures of cognitive control, working memory and verbal fluency. We fitted linear mixed effects models (LME) with the EF composite score as the outcome variable and a random intercept for subject. We evaluated baseline differences and differential rates of decline between carriers and noncarriers by specifying a group*time interaction, covarying for age, education and gender. We fit a LME model to assess whether longitudinal changes in the EF composite were associated with changes in clinical symptomology (CDR Sum of Boxes, CDR-SB). We compared these results to Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B), a paper-and-pencil executive measure. Unstandardized regression coefficients (b) are reported below Carriers performed worse than noncarriers at baseline (b=-.32, p=.015), and there was a significant group*time interaction (b=-.14, p=.044), indicating that carriers had a more negative slope over time. Decreasing longitudinal EF performance was associated with increased clinical symptomology (CDR-SB,b=-.24, p<.001). The interaction coefficient was in the same direction but reduced by 30% when we restricted the analysis to carriers with CDR = 0 (b=-.09, p=.208). In contrast, carriers and noncarriers did not differ at baseline (b=31.33, p=.194) or in their rate of change on Trails B (b=13.51, p=.616). In familial FTD mutation carriers, the NIH-EXAMINER is sensitive to cognitive changes that precede conversion to dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicPharmacy and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207