New applications of the mathematical model of a permeation passive sampler: prediction of the effective uptake rate and storage stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the applications of passive sampling in environmental analysis are increasing, it is crucial to ensure that the methods applied in the measurement of pollutant concentrations provide sufficient accuracy in compliance with existing regulations. Additionally, as with any sampling method in an analytical process, sample integrity is essential for accurate determination of contaminants and their concentrations. In a recent study, a mathematical model was developed to describe the sampling process in permeation passive samplers. The model was able to predict the significance of potential uptake rate changes during sampling. The model also predicted the distribution of the sampled analyte within the different compartments of the sampler. In the present work, the model was extended to include two practical applications. In the first part, a novel method allowing prediction of the effective uptake rate of the sampler is presented. The method accounts for changes in the uptake rate during the exposure time caused by resistance to mass transfer in the sorbent bed, allowing accurate calculation of the time weighted average concentrations. The method was proven to be successful through experimental verification that involved sampling toluene and trichloroethylene using the Waterloo Membrane Sampler (WMS). In the second part, the post-sampling storage period of analytes in the WMS was evaluated. It was found both theoretically and experimentally that analyzing the sorbent only is sufficient to quantify the analytes collected, as the amount retained in the remaining compartments of the sampler (PDMS membrane, air inside the sampler and the storage vial) is negligible after sampling. The amounts of analytes collected by the sorbent were stable over up to three-weeks of storage at room temperature. These findings establish confidence in the use of the WMS for sampling Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".