MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897596091 · doi:10.1039/c8em00397a

New applications of the mathematical model of a permeation passive sampler: prediction of the effective uptake rate and storage stability

2018· article· en· W2897596091 on OpenAlexafffund
Faten Salim, Tadeusz Górecki, Marios A. Ioannidis

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science Processes & Impacts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermeationStability (learning theory)Environmental scienceChemistryComputer scienceMembraneMachine learningBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the applications of passive sampling in environmental analysis are increasing, it is crucial to ensure that the methods applied in the measurement of pollutant concentrations provide sufficient accuracy in compliance with existing regulations. Additionally, as with any sampling method in an analytical process, sample integrity is essential for accurate determination of contaminants and their concentrations. In a recent study, a mathematical model was developed to describe the sampling process in permeation passive samplers. The model was able to predict the significance of potential uptake rate changes during sampling. The model also predicted the distribution of the sampled analyte within the different compartments of the sampler. In the present work, the model was extended to include two practical applications. In the first part, a novel method allowing prediction of the effective uptake rate of the sampler is presented. The method accounts for changes in the uptake rate during the exposure time caused by resistance to mass transfer in the sorbent bed, allowing accurate calculation of the time weighted average concentrations. The method was proven to be successful through experimental verification that involved sampling toluene and trichloroethylene using the Waterloo Membrane Sampler (WMS). In the second part, the post-sampling storage period of analytes in the WMS was evaluated. It was found both theoretically and experimentally that analyzing the sorbent only is sufficient to quantify the analytes collected, as the amount retained in the remaining compartments of the sampler (PDMS membrane, air inside the sampler and the storage vial) is negligible after sampling. The amounts of analytes collected by the sorbent were stable over up to three-weeks of storage at room temperature. These findings establish confidence in the use of the WMS for sampling Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science Processes & ImpactsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207