MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2897631076 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy374.041

A phase I trial of BI 754091, a programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2018· article· en· W2897631076 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa L. Johnson, Manish R. Patel, Lillian L. Siu, Raid Aljumaily, Mark Kozloff, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Mabrouk Elgadi, Miaomiao Ge, Christine Duffy, Ralph Graeser, Susanne Buschke, Sheetal Khedkar, Suzanne F. Jones, Howard A. Burris

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityAdverse effectPharmacokineticsInternal medicineOncologyCancerPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tumors can evade immune responses through expression of PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), which, upon binding to PD-1 on activated T-cells, initiates immunosuppressive signals in the tumor. Therapeutic PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition can block this interaction and restore pro-inflammatory anti-tumor activity. BI 754091 is a monoclonal IgG4Pro antibody inhibitor of PD-1 with proven in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity. In this first-in-human study, we evaluate BI 754091 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible pts had exhausted standard treatment (tx) options, including prior anti-PD-1 tx. Pts received BI 754091 IV every 3 weeks (Q3W) in one of three sequential dose escalation cohorts (80, 240 and 400 mg; 3 pts/cohort) to assess the safety and tolerability, and determine the maximum-tolerated dose/recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Additional anti-PD-1 naïve pts with certain solid tumors are also being enrolled for dose expansion, to be treated at the RP2D. The objectives of the dose expansion phase are to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of BI 754091 at the RP2D in this setting. Results: 35 pts have enrolled as of 19 Feb 2018 (dose escalation, n = 9; dose expansion, n = 26). Safety and PK profiles supported a RP2D of 240 mg Q3W. The most common all-grade tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue (31%; 11 pts) and decreased appetite (14%; 5 pts). No dose-limiting toxicities or tx-related serious AEs were reported. 1 pt had a Grade 3 TRAE (AST elevated). To date, 4 pts have had a confirmed (gastric/ovarian/breast cancer) or unconfirmed (renal cancer) partial response and 16 had stable disease. 8 pts continue on tx. Further efficacy data from the dose-expansion cohort will be reported. Conclusions: BI 754091 was well tolerated at all doses tested for advanced solid tumors, with preliminary evidence of activity. Based on the available safety and PK data, the RP2D for dose expansion was 240 mg Q3W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→