MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Renal replacement Therapy in Saskat chewan: A population based analysis

2018· article· en· W2897669225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Siddiqui, Warren Berry

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Medical Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal replacement therapyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Chronic kidney disease is a critical condition with considerable public health implications. It affects a significant proportion of the general population and when progressive, has an increasing influence on morbidity and mortality. The main purpose of this study was to explore the distribution and trends of renal replacement therapy and vascular access practice patterns among Saskatchewan end stage renal disease patients. Material and Method: This is a registry-based retrospective observational study. Prevalence of patient’s on renal replacement therapy in the Canadian Organ Replacement Register who has information for renal replacement therapy from 2006 to 2016 in the province of Saskatchewan. The composite of demographics, mortality, type of renal replacement therapy, type of vascular access and important blood markers ranges were recorded among both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Results: From 2006 through 2016, a total of 2103 patients with mean age of 69.52±13.2 initiated renal replacement therapy in Saskatchewan. Among those patients, over half of the patients were female (62%). Majority of the patients were Caucasians and Aboriginals. Nearly two third of them were overweight and obese. Less than half developed end stage renal diseases secondary to diabetes and 14.9% had a primary diagnosis of glomerulonephritis. At the end of 2015, prevalence of end-stage kidney disease patients was 1330 in the Saskatchewan. During 2006 to 2016, 72.3% received haemodialysis, 22.8% received peritoneal dialysis, and, catheter was the most frequently used dialysis access method (64.6%). Conclusion: An increasing number of patients with advanced renal disease are being initiated on long-term dialysis every year. Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are the two main types of dialysis provided under renal care programs. Alarmingly, in Saskatchewan, catheter was the most frequently used dialysis access method. Keywords: End Stage Renal Disease; Renal Replacement Therapy; Vascular Access; Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Medical ResearchSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207