Influence of a square pulse voltage on argon-ethyl lactate discharges and their plasma-deposited coatings using time-resolved spectroscopy and surface characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By comparing time-resolved optical emission spectroscopy measurements and the predictions of a collisional-radiative model, the evolutions of electron temperature (Te) and number density of argon metastable atoms [n(Arm)] were determined in argon-ethyl lactate dielectric barrier discharges. The influence of a square pulse power supply on Te, n(Arm), and discharge current is evaluated and correlated with the chemistry and the topography of plasma-deposited coatings. Pulsed discharges were found to have shorter (100 ns) but stronger (1 A) current peaks and higher electron temperatures (0.7 eV) than when using a 35 kHz sinusoidal power supply (2 μs, 30 mA, 0.3 eV). The n(Arm) values seemed to be rather stable around 1011 cm−3 with a sinus power supply. In contrast, with a pulse power supply with long time off (i.e., time without discharge) between each pulse, a progressive increase in n(Arm) from 1011 cm−3 up to 1012–1013 cm−3 was observed. When the time off was reduced, this increase was measured in sync with the current peak. The chemical composition of the coatings was not significantly affected by using a pulse signal, whereas the topography was strongly influenced and led to powder formations when reducing the time off.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".