MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897751190 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201801209

A Finite-Element Based Algorithm for 3d Magnetotelluric Inversion Using Unstructured Meshes for Complex Geological Setti

2018· article· en· W2897751190 on OpenAlexaff
Seyedmasoud Ansari, James A. Craven, Ernst Schetselaar, Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsInversion (geology)Jacobian matrix and determinantAlgorithmComputationFinite element methodPolygon meshComputer scienceComputational scienceGeologyMathematicsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary An inversion methodology and algorithm is developed for inverting Magnetotelluric data for threedimensional Earth conductivity models meshed using unstructured grids. The forward modeling subset of the inversion method is implemented using the E-field vectorial finite-element method for layered or homogeneous Earth models and complex target geometries. The inversion is based on the iterative linearized Gauss-Newton approach with the Jacobian matrix-vector operations calculated implicitly for the sake of memory and storage efficiency. The algorithm is parallelized for multiple frequencies and demonstrated to be feasible in terms of computation time and model accuracy. Preliminary results due to a successful implementation of the algoritm is shown for the Commei 3D-2A model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207