MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2897785250 · doi:10.4310/acta.2022.v228.n2.a1

Ancient low-entropy flows, mean-convex neighborhoods, and uniqueness

2022· article· en· W2897785250 on OpenAlexaff
Kyeongsu Choi, Robert Haslhofer, Or Hershkovits

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Mathematica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsUniquenessRegular polygonEntropy (arrow of time)Mathematical analysisGeometryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The equation of course also makes sense in higher dimension and co-dimension and in other ambient manifolds.In this paper, however, we focus on evolving surfaces in R 3 .k. choi, r. haslhofer and o. hershkovits Classification of ancient low-entropy flowsLet M ⊂R 3 be a surface.The entropy, introduced by Colding-Minicozzi [CM1], is defined as the supremum of the Gaussian area over all centers and all scales, namely Ent[M ] = sup(1.2)The entropy measures, in a certain sense, the complexity of the surface.For example, the values for a plane, sphere and cylinder are Ent[R 2 ] = 1, Ent[S 2 ] = 4 e ∼ 1.47, and Ent[S 1 ×R] = 2π e ∼ 1.52.If M={M t } t∈I evolves by mean-curvature flow, then t !Ent[M t ] is non-increasing by Husiken's monotonicity formula [Hu2], and hence Ent[M] := sup t∈I Ent[M t ] = lim t!inf(I) Ent[M t ].For example, the entropy of a flat plane P, a round shrinking sphere S, a round shrinking cylinder Z, a translating bowl soliton B, and an ancient oval O, are given by Ent[P] = 1, Ent[S] = 4 e ∼ 1.47 Ent[Z] = Ent[B] = Ent[O] = 2π e ∼ 1.52.By a beautiful classification result of Bernstein-Wang [BW] any self-similarly shrinking mean-curvature flow in R 3 with entropy at most 2π/e is either a flat plane, round shrinking sphere, or round shrinking cylinder.By a recent uniqueness result of Hershkovits [He] any self-similarly translating flow in R 3 with entropy at most 2π/e is a bowl soliton.These results in turn build on a pioneering paper by Colding-Ilmanen-Minicozzi-White [CIMW] that was the genesis of the study of low-entropy flows.For the study of singularities, it is important that these concepts are also available in the non-smooth setting.Singular surfaces in Euclidean space are described most easily by 2-rectifiable Radon measures, which generalize the area measure of smooth 2-dimensional surfaces; see e.g.[Si], [I1].Recall that a 2-rectifiable Radon measure µ in R 3 is a Radon measure that has a 2-dimensional tangent plane of positive multiplicity at almost every point.The entropy of µ is defined as Ent[µ] = sup

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Mathematica→Same topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows→French-language works237,207→