MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897872583 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2035

2382. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Infections in Immunocompromised Patients: A Multi-Center Study

2018· article· en· W2897872583 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abdulrahman Elabor, Esther Molnar, Madeline King, Jason C Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesAllerganMerck CanadaShionogiAstellas PharmaAmplyxZoetisSunovionGilead Sciences
KeywordsMedicineClinical microbiologyCephalosporinPseudomonas aeruginosaInternal medicineFamily medicineAntibioticsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL-TAZ) is a novel cephalosporin antibiotic combined with a known β-lactamase inhibitor. It has activity against some extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA). To date, little experience has been published on outcomes with TOL-TAZ for MDRPA infections in immunocompromised patients. This was a retrospective study of adult patients (≥18 years) with an immunocompromising condition (solid-organ transplant; hematologic malignancy; solid tumors; metastatic cancer) at 20 academic medical centers who had microbiologically confirmed MDRPA isolated in culture and received TOL-TAZ for at least 24 hours. 30-day survival, in-hospital mortality, and the rates of microbiologic and clinical cure were assessed. In this study of 65 critically-ill immunocompromised patients, the 30-day survival was 86.1%; clinical cure was78.4% and microbiologic cure 75.3%. TOL-TAZ is a viable option for immunocompromised patients with MDRPA infections. J. Gallagher, Achaogen: Consultant, Consulting fee. Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Research grant. Allergan: Consultant and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Astellas: Consultant and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Cempra: Consultant, Consulting fee. Cidara: Consultant, Consulting fee. CutisPharma: Consultant, Consulting fee. Paratek: Consultant, Consulting fee. Shionogi: Consultant, Consulting fee. Tetraphase: Consultant, Consulting fee. Theravance: Consultant, Consulting fee. The Medicines Company: Consultant, Consulting fee. Melinta: Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207