MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2897886806 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.38

Abstract 38: Soluble ST2 Predicts Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2018· article· en· W2897886806 on OpenAlexaff
Zoe Wolcott, Matthew B. Bevers, Søren Bache, Hannah Irvine, Matthew J. Koch, Amen Patel, Kristen Møller, W. Taylor Kimberly

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubarachnoid hemorrhageModified Rankin ScaleCohortInternal medicineCardiologyIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Soluble ST2 (sST2) is a member of the Toll-like receptor superfamily implicated in pro-inflammatory signaling. We investigated whether sST2 predicts delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and 90-day clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods: Soluble ST2 was measured in plasma samples from 182 patients who presented to a single institution with SAH. Blood samples were collected between days 1 and 5 after onset of SAH, and prior to the onset of DCI. Functional outcome was assessed at 3 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with good and poor outcome defined as mRS 0-2 and 3-6, respectively. Using a consensus definition, DCI was defined as a 2-point drop in GCS over a sustained period in patients whose clinical deterioration could not be explained by another cause. The relationships between sST2 level, DCI and outcome were assessed in univariable analysis. Multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the ability of sST2 to predict outcome and mortality. These findings were tested for replication in an independent cohort of 51 SAH patients recruited from a separate institution. Results: The discovery cohort consisted of 182 subjects (mean age 56±12 years, 61% women). Elevated plasma sST2 predicted the development of DCI (OR 2.10, 95% 1.06-4.18 CI, P=0.0295), which remained an independent predictor after adjustment for age, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grading score, modified Fisher score, intra-arterial vasodilator therapy and hydrocephalus (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.00-7.97, p=0.0453). Elevated sST2 was also independently associated with poor 90-day functional outcome (OR 2.65, 95%CI 1.07-6.59, P =0.0304), and mortality (OR 5.36, 95% CI 1.48-19.39, p=0.0039) when adjusted for age, WFNS score, modified Fisher score and hydrocephalus. In the replication cohort (N=51, 88% women), sST2 level was an independent predictor of DCI (OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.46-17.20, p=0.0034) and outcome at 90 days (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.31-13.74, p=0.0072). Conclusion: Plasma sST2 level predicted risk of DCI, outcome, and mortality after SAH. Further study of the potential link between sST2 and brain injury after SAH is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→