On the Electrochemical Properties of New Materials in the Li<sub>2</sub>o-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> Ternary System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to discover innovative electrode and electrolyte battery materials responding to specific needs in terms of capacity, working voltage, polarisation, alkali insertion mechanisms, it appears interesting to explore various insertion chemistries. With this in mind, our study was dedicated on the structural properties and electrochemical performances of iron vanadates positive electrode for Li batteries. More specifically, our groups focussed on the search for new stable phases in the Li2O - Fe2O3 - V2O5 ternary system with respect to several vanadates (FeVO4, NaCuFe2(VO4)3, β-Cu3Fe4(VO4)6, …), which structural and electrochemical properties upon Li insertion have been highlighted in previous work [1]. Among the Li2O - Fe2O3 - V2O5 system, this presentation is dedicated to two new compounds, which were not known from the literature. Both materials were obtained through solid synthesis routes, after optimising the annealing parameters to reach pure phases. After determination of the structure using single crystal X-Ray Diffraction, their physical and electrochemical properties were thoroughly characterized using SEM, Mossbauer spectroscopy, galvanostatic and potentiostatic cycling. Electrochemical characterizations in half cells resulted in finding the optimal voltage window to enhance the capacity retention of the material as compared to previously studied vanadates. The galvanostatic curves indicated complex mechanisms for both materials involving several monophasic and biphasic steps upon Li insertion (see figure for the structure of LiFeV2O7 viewed along the [-101] direction and its electrochemical curve in half cell). Mossbauer spectroscopy allows assessing the oxidation state of iron atoms in the structures before and upon the electrochemical processes. [1] Patoux, S., Richardson, T.J. “Lithium insertion chemistry of some iron vanadates”, Electrochemistry Communications, 9 (3), pp. 485-491 (2007). [2] Benabed, Y., Castro, L., Penin, N., Darriet, J., Dollé, M. “Synthesis, Structure, and Electrochemical Properties of LiFeV2O7”, Chemistry of Materials, 29 (21), pp. 9292-9299 (2017). Figure 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".