Impaired chromosome segregation results in sperms with excess centrosomes in <i> emb-27 <sup>APC6</sup> </i> mutant <i>C. elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The anaphase-promoting complex (APC) is a major regulator of chromosome segregation and is implicated in centriole engagement, whose de-regulation causes abnormal number of centrosomes. The emb-27 gene in C. elegans encodes a subunit of APC. The paternal emb-27 mutant was reported to show cell division with multiple furrows, suggesting the presence of excess centrosomes. In this study, we examined the number of centrosomes and the mechanism underlying de-regulation of centrosome number in emb-27 mutants. Our observations indicated excess centrosomes in emb-27 sperms, which resulted in zygotes with excess centrosomes. Further, the secondary spermatocyte of emb-27 produced reduced number of spermatids, which is likely the direct cause of the excess number of centrosomes per sperm. We propose that a chromosome segregation defect in emb-27 induced centrosome separation defect, resulting in reduced number of buds. Additionally, treatment with cytoskeletal inhibiting drugs indicated presence of three kinds of forces working in combination to move the centrosomes into the spermatids. The present study suggested a novel role of microtubule in the budding cytokinesis of spermatocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".