REVIEW ON COLUMN FIRE RESISTANCE DESIGN FOR CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns offers an alternative for providing the required fire resistance and load bearing capacity, making its use in medium and high rise structures are highly popular. This paper aims to review the previous studies on CFST column under fire. The standards or codes of practice used in fire resistance designs have been highlighted. The design of the CFST column is summarised with previous investigations on experiments and numerical modelling at ambient temperature and elevated temperature. Different conclusions were drawn depending on the material’s properties, considered parameters and the method used for the investigations. Outer diameter or width of the steel tube, steel tube thickness, concrete grade, column length, and eccentricity of loadings are among the parameters that affects the structural behaviour of CFST columns under fire. Several numerical analyses software were adequately used for simulating the behaviour of CFST columns at elevated temperatures, and validated using experimental results. Furthermore, the advantages of using the fire resistance design approaches on CFST columns filled with lightweight foamed concrete is highlighted. In conclusion, there is the need for more studies on standard fire tests of CFST column filled with light weight foamed concrete which is not covered in the current design guide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".