MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898010863 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.1232

P2‐538: VALIDITY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SCALE FOR THE ELDERLY AMONG PEOPLE WITH MCI OR MILD DEMENTIA

2018· article· en· W2898010863 on OpenAlexaff
Laura E. Middleton, Sandra E. Black, Nathan Herrmann, Paul Oh, Lauren Bechard, Krista L. Lanctôt

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaPhysical activityMedicinePhysical therapyPreferred walking speedTimed Up and Go testPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPopulationGaitGerontologyPsychologyDiseaseInternal medicineBalance (ability)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) is one of the more common physical activity questionnaires used to report physical activity levels of older adults, and is used among older adults with cognitive impairment. It has been validated against energy expenditure and accelerometer measures of physical activity among a variety of groups. However, it has not been validated for use among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia, even though it is used in this population. We enrolled 28 older adults (≥50 years) to a randomized parallel-group trial of center-based versus home-based exercise. Participants were diagnosed with MCI or mild dementia (MoCA≥17 or MMSE≥22), were safe to exercise, and were currently exercising ≤2x/wk. At baseline, participants reported physical activity levels using the PASE and had physical activity assessed using an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3x+) over 7 days. Physical function was assessed using the 6-min walk, 5x sit-stand, and gait speed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was calculated between PASE scores and accelerometer (% time in moderate-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], step count) and physical function scores. Participants’ average age (SD) was 75.5 (8.2) years and education was 15.0 (3.5) years; they were 18% (n=5) female. There were no significant relationships between the PASE score and either accelerometer scores (% time in moderate-vigorous physical activity, step count) or physical function (sit-stand, 6min walk, gait speed) (p>0.07). However, rs were in the expected direction. Non-significant, positive rs occurred between PASE score and % MVPA (rs=0.31, p=0.13), step count (rs=0.30, p=0.14), and 6-min walk time (rs=0.23, p=0.16). Negative rs occurred between PASE score and gait speed (rs=-0.34, p=0.06). Our results are insufficient to support the validation of the PASE of among individuals with MCI or mild dementia. Further work is needed to support use of the PASE in this group. With additional participants enrolled to the trial through late 2018, it is possible that the expanded sample will clarify the validity of the PASE in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207