MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898019265 · doi:10.1109/tap.2018.2876234

Broadband and High-Gain Circularly-Polarized Antenna With Low RCS

2018· article· en· W2898019265 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Zarbakhsh, M. Akbari, Fereshteh Samadi, Abdel-Razik Sebak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsRadar cross-sectionAntenna gainBandwidth (computing)Antenna (radio)WidebandPhysicsMicrostrip antennaMaterials scienceAntenna factorTelecommunicationsComputer scienceScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a wideband circularly polarized (CP) antenna with a low radar cross section (RCS) and high gain properties is investigated. The proposed antenna is based on a combination of the Fabry-Perot cavity (FPC) and sequential feeding technique. The purpose of this antenna is to produce CP with high directive gain over a wide bandwidth while preserving low RCS. The principle of the FPC and resonance is achieved by applying one frequency selective surface (FSS) metasurface. A microstrip slot array operating at the Ka-band, excited by a sequentially rotated feeding network, is designed and fabricated. It is indicated that all the merits mentioned above can be obtained over a broad frequency band by designing a suitable FSS metasurface and modifying the feeding lengths to adjust desirable phase. RCS reduction is realized by 180° ±37° reflection phase variations between adjacent FSS unit cells on the metasurface. The experimental results show that the gain of the antenna with the metasurface is at least 7 dB greater than that of the primary antenna with a peak value approximately 20 dB at 28.5 GHz. In addition, bandwidths of 3-dB gain, impedance (|S11| ≤ -10 dB), and axial ratio ≤3 dB are ranged from 27.5 to 33.5 GHz (19.7%), 26.7 to 34.2 GHz (24.6%), and 26.8 to 33.1 GHz (21%), respectively. The monostatic RCS reduction for a normal incidence is effectively suppressed from 28 to 48 GHz (52%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207