MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2898022438 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.wp27

Abstract WP27: Sex-Related Differences in Disability Adjusted Life Years After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

2018· article· en· W2898022438 on OpenAlexaff
Sunil A. Sheth, Steven Warach, Jan Gralla, Reza Jahan, Mayank Goyal, Raul G. Nogueira, Osama O. Zaidat, Vítor Mendes Pereira, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Helmi L. Lutsep, David S. Liebeskind, Louise D. McCullough, Jeffrey L. Saver

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialSolitaire Cryptographic AlgorithmLife expectancyQuality of life (healthcare)SurgeryPhysical therapyPediatricsIschemic strokeIschemiaPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Randomized trials have shown that mechanical thrombectomy improves 3-month disability outcomes after acute ischemic stroke for both women and men. However post-stroke disability and reduced life expectancy (LE) persists beyond 3 months, and lifetime effects of thrombectomy might differ between men and women. Methods: We analyzed patients treated with the Solitaire stent retriever in the TripleS database (pooled patient-level data from the SWIFT, STAR, and SWIFT-PRIME trials). Years of optimum life after thrombectomy were defined as disability adjusted life-year (DALYs), using the methodology of the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease Project. For each patient, LE was calculated based on age and sex-specific values, and known degree of modification of LE by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) status at 3 months post-stroke. Years of optimum life lost due to disability were calculated by projecting mRS status at 3 months through the remaining LE. Results: Among 389 patients treated with ET, 55% were female, and median NIHSS was 17 [8-28]. There were no differences between females vs. males in presenting deficit severity (NIHSS 17 vs. 17, p=0.21), occlusion location (69% vs. 64% M1, p=0.62), presenting infarct extent (ASPECTS 9 vs. 8, p=0.24), rate of substantial reperfusion (TICI 2b/3, 87% vs. 83%, p=0.37), onset to reperfusion time (277 vs. 306 mins, p=0.46). Women presented at advanced mean age compared to men (69 vs 64, p<0.001). Rates of functional independence at 90 days (53% vs. 56%, p=0.54) were similar in men and women. Without adjusting for age at presentation, years of optimal life (DALYs) following thrombectomy were similar between women and men (9.3 vs 9.6 years, p=0.48). After adjusting for differing ages at presentation, women had more years of optimal life (DALYs) following thrombectomy, 10.6 vs 8.5 years (p<0.001). Conclusions: In age-standardized comparisons, women experience two more optimal years than men following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Greater life expectancies of women, coupled with similar disability outcome distributions, yield substantially greater years of optimal life after intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→