An Experimental and Modeling Study of Carbon Dioxide/Bitumen and C4/Bitumen Phase Behavior at Elevated Temperatures Using Cold Lake Bitumen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The coinjection of carbon dioxide (CO2) or light hydrocarbons with steam in the steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) process might enhance bitumen mobility and reduce the steam/oil ratio (SOR). Understanding and modeling the phase behavior of solvent/bitumen systems are essential for the development of in-situ processes for bitumen recovery. In this paper, an experimental and modeling study is undertaken to characterize the phase behavior of bitumen/CO2 and bitumen/C4 systems. Produced and dewatered oil from the Cenovus Osprey Pilot is used for the experiments. The Osprey Pilot produces oil from the Clearwater Formation. Constant-composition-expansion (CCE) experiments are conducted for characterizing Clearwater bitumen, CO2/bitumen mixture, and C4/bitumen mixture. The Peng and Robinson (1978) equation of state (EOS) (PR-EOS) is calibrated using the measured data and is used for pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) modeling. Multiphase equilibrium calculations are performed to predict the solubility of CO2 and C4 in the temperature range of 393.2 to 453.2 K. The potential of asphaltene precipitation for CO2/bitumen and C4/bitumen mixtures is also investigated using three screening criteria. According to the CCE tests and multiphase equilibrium calculations, C4 has much higher solubility in bitumen than does CO2 at operating pressure of 3997.9 kPa and temperature between 393.2 and 453.2 K (393.2 K < T < 453.2 K). During the CCE tests, coexistence of three equilibrium phases is observed for the C4/bitumen system with high C4 concentration. The three phases consist of a heavy oleic phase (L1), gaseous phase (V), and a light (solvent-rich) oleic phase (L2). Compositional analysis of the samples from L1 and L2 phases shows that C4 can extract light hydrocarbon components from bitumen into the L2 phase and preserve the heavy components in the L1 phase. Also, the L2 phase becomes darker by increasing the pressure, suggesting the extraction of heavier hydrocarbon components at higher pressures. Similar tests on the CO2/bitumen system show only two effective phases over a similar temperature range. The two phases consist of a heavy oleic phase (L1) and a gaseous phase (V). Phase-equilibrium regions are predicted using the regressed EOS model in the compositional space for the solvent/bitumen system. EOS predictions indicate two types of two-phase regions in the composition space for the C4/bitumen system (i.e., L1/L2 when 393.2 K < T < 421.2 K and L1/V when 421.2 K < T < 453.2 K). However, only one type of two-phase region (i.e., L1/V) exists in a similar temperature range for a CO2/bitumen system. The EOS predictions show that 1.8 wt% CO2 can reduce bitumen viscosity by up to 1.4 times, and 16.3 wt% C4 can reduce bitumen viscosity by up to 20 times when 393.2 K < T < 453.2 K. Viscosity calculations indicate that oil dilution by CO2 and C4 dissolution is more effective at lower temperatures, especially for C4. This shows the potential of injecting hot hydrocarbon solvents for bitumen recovery. The results show that asphaltene might precipitate in a system of C4/bitumen with high C4 concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".