Human Blastocyst's Zona Pellucida segmentation via boosting ensemble of complementary learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characteristics of Zona Pellucida (ZP), particularly its thickness, is a key indicator of human blastocyst (day-5 embryo) quality. Therefore, ZP segmentation is an important step towards achieving automatic embryo quality assessment. In this paper, a novel approach based on boosting ensemble of hybrid complementary learning is proposed to segment Zona Pellucida in human blastocyst images. First, an inner-ZP localization method is proposed to separate the ZP from the heavily textured area inside a blastocyst. Then, a deep Hierarchical Neural Network (HiNN) is proposed to segment ZP area. The hierarchical nature of the proposed network enables learning features with respect to their spatial location in the embryo. Finally, a Self-supervised Image-Specific Refinement (SISR) strategy is proposed as a complementary step to boost the performance. The proposed system is a hybrid approach in the sense that the HiNN learns the intra-correlation among images, while the SISR takes into account the inter-correlation within the query image. Experimental results confirm that the proposed method is capable of identifying ZP area with average Precision, Recall, Accuracy and Jaccard Index of 85.2%, 92.0%, 95.6% and 78.1%, respectively. The proposed HiNN system outperforms state of the art by 4.9% in Precision, 11.2% in Recall, 3.6% in Accuracy and 10.7% in Jaccard Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".