:Anglicans and the Atlantic World: High Churchmen, Evangelicals, and the Quebec Connection.<i>(McGill‐Queen's Studies in the History of Religion, Series Two, number 25.)</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Historical study of religion in Canada has flourished over the past quarter‐century, driven by a series of excellent scholarly monographs devoted to Protestant evangelicalism and Roman Catholicism. However, Anglicanism has remained a relatively underdeveloped current within this new historiographic trajectory. Scholars of Canada's religious past have been reluctant to critically approach the study of Anglicanism for two major reasons. First, existing major treatments of Anglicanism have ineluctably identified it with a “failed” British attempt to transplant a church establishment that underpinned a system of aristocratic, conservative values to its North American colonies following the American Revolution. There is an implicit tendency to view Anglicanism as a major part of an obsolete social order doomed to destruction in the face of the “natural” democracy and religious voluntarism characteristic of the Canadian social environment. Second, the very existence of an institution whose identity was so emphatically “British” offends the nationalist proclivities of most Canadian religious historians, whose attention is fixed on those churches whose anticolonial or “North American” tendencies energized nation‐building, both in English Canada and Quebec. At best, within the Canadian religious narrative, the colonial Church of England functions as a convenient foil to the inevitable triumph of religious pluralism, voluntarism, and political democracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".