Anomalous Dipole–Dipole Interaction in an Ensemble of Quantum Emitters and Metallic Nanoparticle Hybrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have developed a theory for the photoluminescence (PL) and scattering cross section of a core–shell hybrid, where the core is the metallic nanoparticle and the shell is made of an ensemble of quantum emitters. A probe field is applied to calculate the scattering cross section of the core–shell hybrid. The surface plasmon polariton field in the metallic nanoparticle is calculated by solving the Maxwell equations in the quasi-static approximation. Dipoles are induced in the ensemble of quantum emitters because of the probe field and surface plasmon polariton field. Therefore, the dipole of one quantum emitter interacts with dipoles of other quantum emitters in the ensemble, and hence, there is the dipole–dipole interaction (DDI) between quantum emitters. We discovered an anomalous DDI, which is induced by the surface plasmon polaritons. It is shown that the strength of the DDI can be controlled by the surface plasmon polariton frequency, and it plays a dominant role in the phenomenon of the PL and scattering cross section. The surface plasmon polariton field can also interact with excitons of the quantum emitters via the exciton-surface plasmon polariton interaction. Using the density matrix method, the PL and scattering cross section are evaluated. It is found that the spectrum of the PL and the scattering cross section splits from one peak into two peaks mainly because of the strong coupling between the excitons and anomalous DDIs. It means that the PL and scattering spectrums can be switched ON (one peak) and OFF (two-peaks). This finding is consistent with the experimental data of the PL and scattering cross section of the J-aggregate and silver core–shell hybrid. We have found that the splitting and height of the two peaks can be increased or decreased by controlling mainly the strength of the anomalous DDI. The anomalous DDIs can be controlled by applying an external pulse pressure and pulse control laser. Hence, the present findings can be used for fabricating nanosensors and nanoswitches for applications in nanotechnology and nanomedicines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".