Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueNature Ecology & Evolution · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityThompson Rivers University
FundersDivision of Environmental BiologyState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess PlateauNational Centre for Biological SciencesAgricultural Research ServiceUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraU.S. Geological SurveyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, DavisSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape ResearchUniversidad de la República UruguayTechnische Universität DarmstadtNelson Mandela UniversityUniversidad de AlcaláUniversidad de Buenos AiresNorth-West UniversityJyväskylän YliopistoChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesDirectorate for Biological SciencesDalhousie UniversityUniversiteit GentLa Trobe UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesRijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity of LeedsDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, State Government of VictoriaThompson Rivers UniversityConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversity of New South WalesTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchUniversité Grenoble AlpesKent State UniversityNational Science FoundationNature ConservancyNSW Office of Environment and HeritageUniversidad de La LagunaUniversity of WyomingColorado State UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsHerbivoreBiodiversityEcologyEcosystemDominance (genetics)BiologySpecies richnessProductivityGrassland
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
