MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898329374 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02537

Vibrio natriegens as Host for Expression of Multisubunit Membrane Protein Complexes

2018· article· en· W2898329374 on OpenAlexaff
Lena Schleicher, Valentin Muras, Björn Claußen, Jens Pfannstiel, Bastian Blombach, Pavel Dibrov, G. Fritz, Julia Steuber

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHost (biology)BiologyMicrobiologyBacteriaProtein expressionVibrioVibrio choleraeCell biologyChemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E. coli is a convenient host for the expression of proteins, but the heterologous production of large membrane protein complexes often is hampered by the lack of specific accessory genes required for membrane insertion or cofactor assembly. In this study we introduce the nonpathogenic and fast-growing Vibrio natriegens as a suitable expression host for membrane-bound proteins from V. cholerae. We achieved production of the primary Na+ pump, the NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (NQR), from V. cholerae in an active state, as indicated by increased overall NADH:quinone oxidoreduction activity of membranes from the transformed V. natriegens, and the sensitivity towards Ag+, a specific inhibitor of the NQR. Complete assembly of V. cholerae NQR expressed in V. natriegens was demonstrated by BN PAGE followed by activity staining. The secondary transport system Mrp from V. cholerae, another membrane-bound multisubunit complex, was also produced in V. natriegens in a functional state, as demonstrated by in vivo Li+ transport. V. natriegens is a promising expression host for the production of membrane protein complexes from Gram-negative pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207