MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898346994 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23372

Preparation of fouling‐resistant and self‐cleaning PVDF membrane via surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for emulsified oil/water separation

2018· article· en· W2898346994 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sakineh Pourziad, Mohammadreza Omidkhah, Mahdi Abdollahi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationUltrafiltration (renal)Contact angleChemical engineeringFoulingBiofoulingFourier transform infrared spectroscopyPolyvinylidene fluorideMaterials scienceAttenuated total reflectionPolymer chemistryPolymerizationFiltration (mathematics)Radical polymerizationChemistryChromatographyPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research describes the modification of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes by grafting poly (N‐isopropylacrylamide) using surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI‐ATRP) in order to detach adhered foulants during oily water filtration. The preparation of self‐cleaning ultrafiltration membranes for oily water treatment has not received much attention in the literature. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy, and water contact angle were used to characterize the structure of membranes. ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy verified the grafting of PNIPAAm from the membrane surface. Membrane performance was investigated by water flux measurement using deionized water and synthetic oily water. The water flux was obviously higher than that of commercial PVDF membrane at different temperatures. Moreover, PNIPAAm concentration and polymerization time were used to optimize the performance of the grafted membranes. N‐isopropyl acrylamide at a concentration of 1.33 mol/L and 30 h reaction time were found as the best condition for ATRP process in this study. The irreversible fouling ratio was only 4.46 % and the maximum of flux recovery ratio was 95.53 % (after cold water rinse), which was obtained for the modified membrane at the best condition. These results show that modified membranes have excellent antifouling property. Grafted membranes also exhibited good oil rejection (95.2 %). Therefore, these easily cleanable membranes could be used to effectively separate emulsified oils from water at different temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207