MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898381741 · doi:10.1109/icelmach.2018.8507176

Vold-Kalman Filtering Order Tracking Based Rotor Flux Linkage Monitoring in PMSM

2018· article· en· W2898381741 on OpenAlexaff
Min Zhu, Wensong Hu, Guodong Feng, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Flux linkageTorque rippleTorqueRotor (electric)Direct torque controlKalman filterComputer scienceTracking (education)Noise (video)RippleFlux (metallurgy)EngineeringPhysicsInduction motorArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring permanent magnet (PM) flux linkage is important to maintain a stable permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) operation. In this paper, V old-Kalman filtering order tracking (VKF-OT) and dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) are used to investigate the application of torque ripple in real-time PM flux monitoring. Firstly, a torque ripple model of PMSM considering electromagnetic noise is proposed, and the torque variation is studied. In this model, the torque is analyzed and processed by wavelet transform to eliminate the effects of the electromagnetic disturbances. Secondly, VKF-OT is introduced to track the order of torque ripple of PMSM running in unsteady state. Therefore, torque ripple characteristics can be used as a feature to reflect changes in PM flux linkage. Thirdly, this method is feasible for PMSM by applying DBN to the training data to estimate the flux linkage during motor operation. The proposed flux monitoring method is validated on a laboratory PMSM. The results demonstrate that this method can monitor the flux variation over a wide speed range at different load levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207