MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898449026 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty888

Alignment-free clustering of UMI tagged DNA molecules

2018· article· en· W2898449026 on OpenAlexaff
Baraa Orabi, Emre Erhan, Brian McConeghy, Stanislav Volik, Stéphane Le Bihan, Robert H. Bell, Colin C. Collins, Cédric Chauve, Faraz Hach

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarcodeCluster analysisComputer scienceDNA sequencingComputational biologyGenomicsData miningBiologyDNAGeneticsGenomeGeneArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Next-Generation Sequencing has led to the availability of massive genomic datasets whose processing raises many challenges, including the handling of sequencing errors. This is especially pertinent in cancer genomics, e.g. for detecting low allele frequency variations from circulating tumor DNA. Barcode tagging of DNA molecules with unique molecular identifiers (UMI) attempts to mitigate sequencing errors; UMI tagged molecules are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified, and the PCR copies of UMI tagged molecules are sequenced independently. However, the PCR and sequencing steps can generate errors in the sequenced reads that can be located in the barcode and/or the DNA sequence. Analyzing UMI tagged sequencing data requires an initial clustering step, with the aim of grouping reads sequenced from PCR duplicates of the same UMI tagged molecule into a single cluster, and the size of the current datasets requires this clustering process to be resource-efficient. RESULTS: We introduce Calib, a computational tool that clusters paired-end reads from UMI tagged sequencing experiments generated by substitution-error-dominant sequencing platforms such as Illumina. Calib clusters are defined as connected components of a graph whose edges are defined in terms of both barcode similarity and read sequence similarity. The graph is constructed efficiently using locality sensitive hashing and MinHashing techniques. Calib's default clustering parameters are optimized empirically, for different UMI and read lengths, using a simulation module that is packaged with Calib. Compared to other tools, Calib has the best accuracy on simulated data, while maintaining reasonable runtime and memory footprint. On a real dataset, Calib runs with far less resources than alignment-based methods, and its clusters reduce the number of tentative false positive in downstream variation calling. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Calib is implemented in C++ and its simulation module is implemented in Python. Calib is available at https://github.com/vpc-ccg/calib. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207