MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898473897 · doi:10.1680/jenes.18.00029

Contaminants of emerging concern in Sharjah wastewater treatment plant, Sharjah, UAE

2018· article· en· W2898473897 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Abdallah Shanableh, Mohammad H. Semreen, Lucy Semerjian, Mohamed Abdallah, Muath Mousa, Noora Darwish, Zeina Baalbaki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentWastewaterContaminationSewage treatmentMedicineEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence and fate of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in wastewater have received growing attention due to their potential impacts on human health and the environment. In this study, the authors assessed the presence of CECs in the influent and effluent of the Sharjah wastewater treatment plant (SWWTP), a conventional activated sludge system, over a 1 year period. Sharjah is the capital city of the Emirate of Sharjah in the UAE. Characterisation of the CECs required development of elaborate analytical techniques for detection and quantification of CECs at the nanogram per litre level. A total of 57 CECs were detected and identified, of which ten pharmaceuticals, including seven antibiotics, an analgesic/antipyretic medicine, a β-blocker and an antipsychotic drug were quantified. The measured concentrations of the ten quantified pharmaceuticals were in the tens to hundreds of nanograms per litre, except for acetaminophen, which reached micrograms per litre levels. The quantified CECs in the effluent were 4–69% of their levels in the influent, indicating apparent removals in the range 31–97%. This study is the first one on the presence and removal of CECs in the SWWTP and contributes essential literature on the subject in Sharjah and the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207