Fully optimized implementation of the cluster‐in‐molecule local correlation approach for electron correlation calculations of large systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fully optimized implementation of the cluster-in-molecule (CIM) local correlation method for faster and more accurate electron correlation calculations of large systems is reported. The speedup comes from the new procedure of constructing virtual localized molecular orbitals of clusters. In the new procedure, Boughton-Pulay projection method is employed instead of a much more expensive Boys localization procedure. In addition, basis set superposition error correction for binding energy calculations and parallelized electron correlation calculations of clusters are now implemented. Benchmark calculations and illustrative applications at the Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD), and CCSD with perturbative triples correction levels show that this newly optimized CIM approach is a reliable theoretical tool for electron correlation calculations of various large chemical systems. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it